SARS-COV-2 Infection in Children and Young People in Bulgaria - A Prospective, Single-Center, Cohort Study

Compared to other respiratory viruses, the proportion of hospitalizations due to SARS-CoV-2 among children is relatively low. While severe illness is not common among children and young individuals, a particular type of severe condition called multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) has been reported. The aim of this prospective cohort study, which followed a group of individuals under the age of 19, was to examine the characteristics of patients who had contracted SARS-CoV-2, including their coexisting medical conditions, clinical symptoms, laboratory findings, and outcomes. The study also aimed to investigate the features of children who met the WHO case definition of MIS-C, as well as those who required intensive care. A total of 270 patients were included between March 2020 and December 2021. The eligible criteria were individuals between 0-18 with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection at the Infectious Disease Hospital "Prof. Ivan Kirov"in Sofia, Bulgaria. Nearly 76% of the patients were <= 12 years old. In our study, at least one comorbidity was reported in 28.1% of the cases, with obesity being the most common one (8.9%). Less than 5% of children were transferred to an intensive care unit. We observed a statistically significant difference in the age groups, with children between 5 and 12 years old having a higher likelihood of requiring intensive care compared to other age groups. The median values of PaO2 and SatO2 were higher among patients admitted to the standard ward, while the values of granulocytes and C-reactive protein were higher among those transferred to the intensive care unit. Additionally, we identified 26 children who met the WHO case definition for MIS-C. Our study data supports the evidence of milder COVID-19 in children and young individuals as compared to adults. Older age groups were associated with higher incidence of both MIS-C and ICU admissions.Copyright © 2023 P. Velikov et al., published by Sciendo.

A Case of a Relapsing Remitting Macrophage Activating Syndrome After Covid-19 Vaccine In a Teenager with UNC13D Heterozygous Variant of Uncertain Significance

Introduction: Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a severe hyper inflammatory condition caused by the over-activation and proliferation of T cells, NK cells and macrophages. It is often associated with complications of rheumatic/immune diseases. We present a case of a 15-year-old female who experiences recurrent episodes of MAS without any known definitive underlying etiology. Case Presentation: A 15-year-old previously healthy female developed fatigue, fevers, myalgia, chest pain, splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy 10 days after receiving her first Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Her symptoms recurred 10 days after receiving the second dose. Her myocarditis, MIS-C, and infectious work up was negative except for positive EBV IgG. Laboratory studies revealed anemia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypofibrinogenemia, and hyperferritinemia. She initially responded to decadron;however, her symptoms recurred with steroid taper. Bone marrow biopsy revealed hemophagocytosis. Whole exome sequencing (WES) revealed a heterozygous variant of uncertain significance in UNC13D c.962C>A (p.Thr321Asn). She had multiple re-admissions with significantly elevated inflammatory markers, including extremely high IL2-R, IL-18 and CXCL9. Each episode was complicated by an acute viral infection. She responds to high dose steroids, anti-IL-1, and JAK inhibitors. Nonetheless, it has been difficult to wean decadron without triggering a flare. She continues to require increasing doses of baricitinib. Discussion(s): MAS may be seen as a complication of rheumatic diseases, as well as inborn errors of immunity. However, none of these conditions have been diagnosed in this patient despite extensive testing, including WES. The degree of her immune dysregulation has been very severe making her disease process unpredictable and extremely difficult to control. She has frequent flares precipitated by viral infections or attempts at adjusting her immunomodulators. Weaning her medications has been challenging as she continues to require increasing doses of baricitinib and corticosteroids. The UNC13D gene is associated with autosomal recessive familial hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis type 3 (FHL3). Our patient is heterozygous for an UNC13D variant of uncertain significance. Additional genetic inquiries with whole genome sequencing to help elucidate the underlying etiology of her severe condition is being conducted. We hypothesize she developed MAS due to a combination of genetic predisposition, prior EBV infection, and immune stress associated with the COVID-19 vaccine. [Formula presented] [Formula presented] [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

Anti-interferon-alpha autoantibodies in patients with inborn errors of Immunity and rheumatic diseases before and during the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction: Type 1 interferon (IFN) autoantibodies, such as anti-IFNalpha, have pathogenic significance in life-threatening COVID-19 pneumonia. Ten to twenty percent of severe COVID cases are associated with type I IFN autoantibodies. These autoantibodies likely pre-exist while others arise de novo relative to SARS-CoV-2 infection. It is unclear to what extent type I anti-IFN autoantibodies are induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection and contribute to COVID-19 severity. We investigated these phenomena in those with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) and rheumatic disease (RHE). Aim(s): We aim to compare the prevalence and neutralization ability of anti-IFNalpha autoantibodies in IEI and RHE patients using archived blood samples before and after the COVID-19 pandemic began. Method(s): We determined the presence of autoantibodies against IFNalpha in plasma samples by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in 453 patients with IEI or RHE who were testing either before or after the COVID-19 pandemic began in March 2020. Using flow cytometry, we determined the function of IFNalpha autoantibodies in plasma to block CD4T cell activation by inhibiting STAT-1 phosphorylation. Result(s): We found that 25 patients with IEI or RHE were positive for anti-IFNalpha autoantibodies. 10 out of 229 patient samples collected before the pandemic (4.2%) tested positive whereas 15 out of 224 patient samples collected after the pandemic began (7.0%) were positive. Seven of the 25 patients (28%) who tested positive had neutralizing antibodies in plasma, which prevented STAT-1 phosphorylation in CD4T cells;all of these patients had partial recombination activating gene deficiency (pRD) except for one patient with autoimmunity, leukemia and selective IgA deficiency. One pRD patient had anti-IFNalpha autoantibodies with neutralization capacity before the pandemic, which persisted after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with full immune reconstitution. The patient was immunized for SARS-CoV-2 before and after HSCT and acquired COVID-19 infection a year after HSCT. The patient was symptomatic but never hospitalized and fully recovered despite having anti-IFNalpha autoantibodies. Conclusion(s): Anti-IFNalpha autoantibody levels were comparable before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in IEI and RHE patients but only 28% of cases were neutralizing. The clinical implications of these autoantibodies are yet to be determined.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc.

EXPERIENCE WITH TIXAGEVIMAB AND CILGAVIMAB (EVUSHELD) IN 86 RHEUMATIC PATIENTS UNDERGOING ANTI-B CELL THERAPY WITH RITUXIMAB.

The problem of prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IMRD) remains highly relevant. The presence of IRD is associated with a high risk of disease and severe course of COVID-19 during immunosuppressive treatment, primarily anti-B cell therapy with rituximab (RTX), and a low level of post-vaccination response in such patients. A new strategy for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 are virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to coronavirus;currently, combined long-acting monoclonal antibodies tixagevimab and cilgavimab (Evusheld) are registered for prevention in the world and the Russian Federation. . Tixagevimab and cilgavimab (TC) show neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2, including the Omicron strain, primarily its variants BA.4, BA.5, BA.2.75 ("Centaur"). Objective - to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TC for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19 in rheumatic patients receiving RTX, based on a prospective observational study. Materials and methods. The main group included 86 patients with various IMRD receiving RTX: 50 of them had ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis (AAV), 15 - rheumatoid arthritis, 9 - Sjogren's syndrome (SS), 4 - IgG4-related disease, 3 - systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 3 - dermatomyositis (DM), 2 - systemic scleroderma (SSD). Median age was 59 (19-82) years;male: female ratio - 1:1,8. From March 26 to August 30 2022, patients received a single intramuscular injection of TC in a total dose of 300 mg, mainly after RTX (in 52% of cases, in 28% on the next day after RTX). The control group included 42 patients with AAV (median age - 45 (35-71) years;male: female ratio - 1:1), also treated with RTX, who did not receive pre-exposure prophylaxis of TC. The duration of observation was 7 months, until November 1 2022. At this time, 98% of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the Russian Federation were Omicron. A telephone and/or online survey of patient has been conducted to detect cases of COVID-19 and adverse reactions. Results. In the TC group, confirmed coronavirus infection have been detected in 17 (20%) patients (AAV - 10, SS - 3, SSD - 2, SLE - 1, DM - 1), with fever in 7 (8%), only in one case hospitalization was required (lung damage was not detected in computed tomography), in two cases, according to CT mild lung damage (CT 1-2), there were no deaths. Good TC's tolerability was noted, signs not associated with COVID-19 or progression of IMRD after administration of TC were observed in 8 (9%) patients (GPA - 3 MPA - 1, RA - 2, SLE - 1, IgG4-related disease - 1), adverse reactions definitely associated with the use of TC were not found. The most serious event not associated with coronavirus infection was the progression of polyneuropathy in a patient with RA. In the control group, 3 (7%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, one with severe lung injury (CT 3, pulmonary embolism) and death. Conclusions. The data of clinical studies and our own clinical experience evidence the effectiveness of the use of a combination of long-acting monoclonal antibodies TC (Evusheld), registered for indications for pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19. Patients with IMRD treated with RTX have a favorable safety profile of TC. The introduction of virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, a new drug class for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, opens significant prospects for improving the prognosis of patients with IRD.Copyright © 2023 Ima-Press Publishing House. All rights reserved.

Global disparities in the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: results from an international online survey study.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore current practice and interregional differences in the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs). We triangulated these observations considering countries' Gross National Income (GNI), disease subtypes, and symptoms using patient-reported information. METHODS: A cross-sectional ancillary analysis of the "COVID-19 vaccination in auto-immune disease" (COVAD) e-survey containing demographic characteristics, IIM subtypes (dermatomyositis (DM), polymyositis (PM), inclusion-body myositis (IBM), anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD), immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), overlap myopathies (OM)), current symptoms (surrogate for organ involvement), and treatments (corticosteroids (CS), immunomodulators (IM), i.e., antimalarials, immunosuppressants (IS), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), biological treatments, and targeted-synthetic small molecules). Treatments were presented descriptively according to continents, GNI, IIM, and organ involvement, and associated factors were analyzed using multivariable binary logistic regressions. RESULTS: Of 18,851 respondents from 94 countries, 1,418 with IIM were analyzed (age 61 years, 62.5% females). DM (32.4%), IBM (24.5%), and OM (15.8%) were the most common subtypes. Treatment categories included IS (49.4%), CS (38.5%), IM (13.8%), and IVIG (9.4%). Notably, treatments varied across regions, GNI categories (IS mostly used in higher-middle income, IM in lower-middle income, IVIG and biologics largely limited to high-income countries), IIM subtypes (IS and CS associated with ASSD, IM with OM and DM, IVIG with IMNM, and biological treatments with OM and ASSD) and disease manifestations (IS and CS with dyspnea). Most inter-regional treatment disparities persisted after multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: We identified marked regional treatment disparities in a global cohort of IIM. These observations highlight the need for international consensus-driven management guidelines considering patient-centered care and available resources.

Free Light Chains κ and λ as New Biomarkers of Selected Diseases.

Diagnostic and prognostic markers are necessary to help in patient diagnosis and the prediction of future clinical events or disease progression. As promising biomarkers of selected diseases, the free light chains (FLCs) κ and λ were considered. Measurements of FLCs are currently used in routine diagnostics of, for example, multiple myeloma, and the usefulness of FLCs as biomarkers of monoclonal gammopathies is well understood. Therefore, this review focuses on the studies concerning FLCs as new potential biomarkers of other disorders in which an inflammatory background has been observed. We performed a bibliometric review of studies indexed in MEDLINE to assess the clinical significance of FLCs. Altered levels of FLCs were observed both in diseases strongly connected with inflammation such as viral infections, tick-borne diseases or rheumatic disorders, and disorders that are moderately associated with immune system reactions, e.g., multiple sclerosis, diabetes, cardiovascular disorders and cancers. Increased concentrations of FLCs appear to be a useful prognostic marker in patients with multiple sclerosis or tick-borne encephalitis. Intensive synthesis of FLCs may also reflect the production of specific antibodies against pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, abnormal FLC concentrations might predict the development of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Markedly elevated levels are also associated with increased risk of hospitalization and death in patients with cardiovascular disorders. Additionally, FLCs have been found to be increased in rheumatic diseases and have been related to disease activity. Furthermore, it has been suggested that inhibition of FLCs would reduce the progression of tumorigenesis in breast cancer or colitis-associated colon carcinogenesis. In conclusion, abnormal levels of κ and λ FLCs, as well as the ratio of κ:λ, are usually the result of disturbances in the synthesis of immunoglobulins as an effect of overactive inflammatory reactions. Therefore, it seems that κ and λ FLCs may be significant diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of selected diseases. Moreover, the inhibition of FLCs appears to be a promising therapeutical target for the treatment of various disorders where inflammation plays an important role in the development or progression of the disease.

Third Booster Dose Vaccine against Sars-Cov-2 in Primary Sjogren's Syndrome: Longitudinal Cohort from the Safer Study

Objectives: Few studies evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of different COVID-19 vaccine platforms in patients with primary Sjogren's Syndrome (pSS). The present study aims to assess the immunogenicity through anti-spike IgG antibodies after the COVID-19 vaccine dose in heterologous groups compared to homologous regimen in patients with pSS. Method(s): These data are from the SAFER study: 'Safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine in rheumatic disease', a real-life phase IV multicenter longitudinal study, evaluating patients since before the first dose. Pregnant women, those with a history of serious adverse events prior to any vaccine, and those with other causes of immunosuppression were excluded. Patients with pSS > 18 years, classified according to ACR/EULAR 2016 classification criteria were included. Antibodies against the Receptor Binding Domain - RBD portion of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 (IgG-S) were measured by chemiluminescence (Architect SARS-CoV-2 Quanti II, Abbott), before the first dose and 28 days after the 2nd and 3rd dose. Seropositivity was defined as IgG-Spike titers >=7.1 BAU/mL. Patients received adenoviral vector (ChAdOx1, Astrazeneca), mRNA (Pfizer) or inactivated SARS-COV-2 (Coronavac). Non-parametric methods were used. The alpha level of significance was set at 5%. Result(s): 56 participants received 3 doses, 46 +/- 11 years old, disease duration 7.62 years, 92.9% female, 41.1% White and 55.4% Mixed. The homologous third-booster dose group (n = 15, all ChAdOx1) and heterologous group (n = 41) were homogeneous for age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidities, medication and baseline IgG-S median [IQR] titers. After primary vaccination (2 doses) IgG-S median and titers [IQR] were similar in homologous and heterologous groups (373.03 [179.58, 843.92] vs. 473.36 [119.05, 1059.60], p = 0.705). Third-booster dose induced higher IgG-S median [IQR] titers compared to only 2 doses (1229.54 [333.55, 4365.47] vs 464.95 [140.42, 1015.25], p alpha 0.001). Heterologous 3rd-booster induced higher IgG-S median [IQR] titers than homologous scheme with ChAdOx1 (1779.52 [335.83, 4523.89] vs 730.76 [303.37, 1858.98], p = 0.150), Fig 1 and 2, although not statistically significant. Conclusion(s): Third booster dose induced higher humoral immune response compared to two doses whichmay improve protection against COVID-19 in patients with pSS. Although not statistically significant, the response to the heterologous scheme tended to be better than the response to the homologous booster vaccination, which heterologous booster scheme tended to respond better than homologous booster vaccination, which is relevant in this immunosuppressed population. Increasing the sample size will help clarify this issue. .

C-Reactive Protein Rise in Rheumatology Patients Following Covid-19 Vaccination

Background/Aims With widespread implementation of COVID-19 vaccine, there has been concern that it would trigger an immune activation due to its immunogenic properties. There is low-level evidence that patients with rheumatological diagnosis often have a disease flare following COVID-19 vaccination which not only has personal health implications but also wider socioeconomic implications. Inflammatory arthritis patients are classified as vulnerable patients requiring booster vaccinations. Therefore, there is a need to ascertain whether there is a risk of disease flare in this group of patients so as to counsel them appropriately in order to ensure flares are managed in timely manner. This study aims to determine the proportion of patients with inflammatory arthritis who have a flare of their rheumatological disease within 30 days of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine using CRP as a surrogate marker. Methods A retrospective notes review was conducted of patients with inflammatory arthritis within 30 days of their COVID-19 vaccine. An electronic database (DAWN) was used to identify all patients that were currently on a disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) or biologic therapy. This was then correlated with vaccine data from the National Immunisation and Vaccination system (NIVS) and C-reactive protein (CRP) within 30 days of their vaccination. Results 1620 adults were identified from DAWN databases (mean age 61 years, 64% female). Three types of vaccination were used: AstraZeneca (AZ), BioNTech-Pfizer or Moderna. Vaccine uptake was 1542/1620 (95.2% 1st dose), 1550/1620 (95.7% 2nd dose) and 1437/ 1620 (88.7% 3rd dose). 192/1542 patients (12.5%) had a CRP rise of greater than 10mg/L within 30 days of their vaccine, which was higher than baseline flare rate of 8.6% (p=0.0004). Conclusion Patients with inflammatory arthritis and on DMARDS have high uptake of COVID-19 vaccine (95%) which is greater than the national average. A CRP rise greater than 10mg/L within 30 days of vaccination was observed in roughly 1 in 10 patients in our study population on all three doses which is consistent with other studies in the literature. Our results show statistically significant increase in the rate of disease flare (12.5% compared with baseline rate of 8.6%). However, SARS-CoV-2 infection has been shown many times to be an independent risk factor for rheumatic disease flare ranging from 20-40%. Therefore, patients with inflammatory arthritis should still be encouraged to receive COVID-19 vaccination. To maintain high levels of vaccine uptake, it is important to ensure that patients are aware of the risks of vaccinations and sufficiently safety netted so flares are managed early. As on-going booster vaccinations are planned for rheumatology patients, we recommend further research to better inform and counsel our patients. Furthermore, this study calls for diligence in monitoring patients with inflammatory arthritis for disease flare and for swift intervention to prevent losing disease control.

Trends for Opioid Prescriptions and the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic among Patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases between 2006 and 2021

Background/Aims Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are some of the most common indications for prescribed opioids. It is unclear how opioid prescribing has changed in the UK for RMDs, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic with limited healthcare access and cancelled elective-surgical interventions, which could impact prescribing in either direction. We aimed to investigate trends in opioid prescribing in RMDs and assess the impact of the pandemic in the UK. Methods Adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), osteoarthritis (OA) and fibromyalgia with opioid prescriptions between 01/Jan/2006-31/Aug/2021 without prior cancer in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) were included. We calculated ageand gender-standardised yearly rates of people with opioid prescriptions between 2006-2021, and identified change points in trends by checking whether the rate of change of standardised rates crossed zero. For people with opioid prescriptions, monthly measures of mean morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/day were calculated between 2006-2021. To assess the impact of the pandemic, we fitted regression models to the monthly number of people with opioid prescriptions between Jan/2015-Aug/2021. The time coefficient reflects the trend pre-pandemic and the interaction term coefficient represents the change in the trend during the pandemic. Results We included 1,313,519 patients: 36,932 with RA, 12,649 with PsA, 6,811 with AxSpA, 6,423 with SLE, 1,255,999 with OA, and 66,944 with fibromyalgia. People with opioid prescriptions increased from 2006 to 2018 for OA, to 2019 for RA, AxSpA and SLE, to 2020 for PsA, and to 2021 for fibromyalgia, and all plateaued/decreased afterwards. OA patients on opioids increased from 466.8/10,000 persons in 2006 to a peak of 703.0 in 2018, followed by a decline to 575.3 in 2021. From 2006 to 2021, there was a 4.5-fold increase in fibromyalgia opioid users (17.7 vs.78.5/10,000 persons). In this period, MME/day increased for all RMDs, with the highest for fibromyalgia (>=35). During COVID-19 lockdowns, RA, PsA and fibromyalgia showed significant changes in the trend of people with opioid prescriptions. With a decreasing trend for RA (-0.001,95%CI=-0.002,-0.001) and a decreasing-to-flat curve for PsA (0.0010,95%CI=0.0006,0.0015) prepandemic until Feb/2020, the trends changed by -0.005 (95%CI=-0.008,-0.002) for RA and -0.003 (95%CI=-0.006,-0.0003) for PsA, leading to steeper decreasing trends during the pandemic (Mar/2020-Aug/2021). Fibromyalgia, conversely, had an increasing trend (0.009,95%CI=0.008,0.009) pre-pandemic, and this trend started decreasing by -0.009 (95%CI=-0.011,-0.006) during the pandemic. Conclusion The plateauing/decreasing trend of people with opioid prescriptions in RMDs after 2018 may reflect the efforts to tackle the rising opioid prescribing in UK primary care. Of all RMDs, fibromyalgia patients had the highest MME/day throughout the study period. COVID-19 lockdowns contribute to fewer people on opioids for most RMDs, reassuring there was no sudden increase in opioid prescribing during the pandemic.

Relation between coronavirus disease 2019 severity and short outcome in rheumatic disease Patients

Background Three years ago, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was the most threatening issue that the world was forced to fight. The interrelationship between COVID-19 and autoimmunity is complex and bidirectional. There was world concern about the severity of COVID infection in rheumatic patients;however, other studies have found no difference between them and the general population. Objectives To study the clinical character of rheumatic disease patients (RDP) with COVID and the outcome and compare this outcome with the nonrheumatic patients. Patients and methods This investigation was conducted retrospectively;all patients were recruited from quarantine hospitals. This study included 100 randomly selected COVID-19 patients with RDP and 200 COVID-19 patients with comorbidities other than rheumatological disease. Results The RDP presented with fever in 75%, and more than 60% developed cough and dyspnea. One-third of the patients developed anosmia and 25% lost the taste sensation;72% of the studied RDP were admitted to Ain Shams University's quarantine hospitals. Mean of the patients' hospital stay of RDP was 15.4 +/- 6.7;38% of those were admitted to the ICU. Moreover, 27% had needed mechanical ventilation, 14% developed cytokine storm, and finally, 11% of RDP died due to COVID infection;89% of RDP had been resolved from COVID infection. Conclusions Three-quarters of the recruited patients needed hospitalization. The mortality was 11%. The frequency of hospitalization and mortality of RDP were related significantly to the severity of COVID-19 infection, presence of comorbidity, and use of cyclophosphamide. Despite this, the outcomes of rheumatic patients and the general population were not significantly different.Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.

Post Covid-19 Syndrome in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: Results from the Covid-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (Covad) Study

Background/Aims Post COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is an emerging cause of morbidity and poor quality of life in COVID-19 survivors. We aimed to assess the prevalence, risk factors, outcomes, and association with disease flares of PCS in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs) and non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases (nrAIDs), both vulnerable groups understudied in the current literature using data from the 2nd COVID-19 Vaccination in Autoimmune Diseases (COVAD) global multicentre patient self-reported e-survey. Methods The survey was circulated from February to July 2022 by the international COVAD Study Group (157 collaborators from 106 countries), and demographics, comorbidities, AIRD/nrAID status, COVID-19 history, vaccination details, and PROMIS physical and mental function were recorded. PCS was defined as symptom resolution time >90 days following acute COVID-19. Predictors of PCS were analysed using regression models for the different groups. Results 7666 total respondents completed the survey. Of these, 2650 respondents with complete responses had positive COVID-19 infection, and 1677 (45.0% AIRDs, 12.5% nrAIDs, 42.5% HCs) completed the survey >90 days post acute COVID-19. Of these, 136 (8.1%) had PCS. Prevalence of PCS was higher in AIRDs (10.8%) than healthy controls HCs (5.3%) (OR: 2.1;95%CI: 1.4-3.1, p=0.002). Across the entire cohort, a higher risk of PCS was seen in women (OR: 2.9;95%CI: 1.1-7.7, p=0.037), patients with long duration of AIRDs/ nrAIDs (OR 1.01;95%CI: 1.0-1.02, p=0.016), those with comorbidities (OR: 2.8;95%CI: 1.4-5.7, p=0.005), and patients requiring oxygen supplementation for severe acute COVID-19 (OR: 3.8;95%CI: 1.1- 13.6, p=0.039). Among patients with AIRDs, comorbidities (OR 2.0;95%CI: 1.08-3.6, p=0.026), and advanced treatment (OR: 1.9;95%CI: 1.08-3.3, p=0.024), or intensive care (OR: 3.8;95%CI: 1.01-14.4, p=0.047) for severe COVID-19 were risk factors for PCS. Notably, patients who developed PCS had poorer PROMIS global physical [15 (12-17) vs 12 (9-15)] and mental health [14 (11-16) vs 11 (8-14)] scores than those without PCS. Conclusion Individuals with AIRDs have a greater risk of PCS than HCs. Associated comorbid conditions, and advanced treatment or intensive care unit admission for severe COVID-19 confer a higher risk of PCS. It is imperative to identify risk factors for PCS for immediate multidisciplinary management in anticipation of poor physical and mental health.

Evaluation of the Prevalence of Psychological Disturbances in Patients with Immune-Mediated Rheumatic Diseases and Covid-19 Infection in an Ambulatory Service

Objectives: COVID-19 is an acute respiratory infection caused by the new coronavirus that has spread around the world, becoming an international public health emergency. Studies have shown a high prevalence of psychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in patients after the infection, a situation that can be evenmore pronounced in patients with chronic diseases such as Immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IRMD). The aim of this study is to evaluate the psychological impact of the COVID-19 infection and pandemic on patients with IRMD as well as to describe the epidemiological profile of the selected population. Method(s): A longitudinal cohort observational study was carried out with a comparison group, based on the analysis of data from patients of Project Reumacov, organized by de Brazilian Society of Rheumatology, in Manaus/ Amazonas. Data regarding the psychological impact was obtained through the application of DASS-21 forms, which evaluated levels of depression, anxiety and stress. Possible answers were divided into four categories according to the frequency of the symptoms presented, such as Not applicable;Present for a short time;Present for a significant amount of time or Present most of the time. Result(s): In total, 283 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 44 years and the majority of the patients were female. The most frequent diagnosis was systemic lupus erythematosus, followed by rheumatoid arthritis. Of the patients included, 270 answered the DASS-21 questionnaire, being 152 in the Case group (patients with COVID-19) and 118 in the Control group (patients without COVID-19). There was a significant statistic correlation between high levels of depression, anxiety and stress and the presence of COVID-19 related symptoms. Conclusion(s): Our study demonstrated that high levels of stress, depression and anxiety were associated to the coronavirus infection. It is, however, difficult to determine whether this scenario is a result of a physiological response to the infection or a consequence of the social context of a pandemic. This knowledge may contribute to a better understanding of COVID-19 infection and its repercussions as well as to highlight the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach aimed at the mental health of patients with rheumatic diseases.

A Survey of Covid-19 Infections in Rheumatology Patients in Shropshire, Uk

Background/Aims To assess the incidence and vulnerability of rheumatology patients to COVID-19 infection in early stages of pandemic. Methods Self completed questionnaire was posted to patients. Results Patients diagnosed with rheumatic diseases were categorised as people at high risk of infection with COVID-19 (pharmacologically immunosuppressed) and with possible worsening outcomes than the general population. This study was a self-completed questionnaire which was sent to all patients registered under a National Health Services specialist rheumatology department in the UK, between May 2020 and May 2021. A total of 610 responses were received and data was analysed statistically. The aim from this survey was to assess COVID19 infection prevalence amongst rheumatology patients under the care of this department, and to examine the profiles of patients with reported COVID-19 infection, their comorbidities, rheumatoidrelated medications and infection severity and outcome. Of 610 responders diagnosed with rheumatoid diseases, 12 patients (1.96%) received a diagnosis of COVID-19 based on their clinical presentation. However, when patients undertaken a Polymerase Chain Reaction test, only 2 patients (16.6%) returned positive results. In both the COVID-19 and non-COVID groups 60% were shielding (n=361). In our sample infection rate was around 30 times (1 in 50 rheumatoid patients, 2% in the sample population) the prevailing rate for the general population in the region (75 in 100,000, 0.075% in the general population). Negative testing did not preclude the presence of disease, but this may reflect poor efficacy and reliability of testing in the early days of the pandemic. The sample means and SD+/- were 63.96/ 13.23 for age and 27.76/5.79 for BMI. Sample population characteristics presented in Table 1. Conclusion This patient group were more vulnerable to COVID-19 infection compared to the general population but appear not to be at greater risk of severe disease.

Long-Term Hydroxychloroquine and Its Association with Covid-19 Infection, a Cohort Study from a South American Hospital

Objectives: We aimed at examining whether patients with rheumatological conditions receiving chronic hydroxychloroquine therapy are at a lower risk of developing SARS-CoV-2 infection than those not receiving hydroxychloroquine. Method(s): This historical cohort study included information of all patients aged 18 years or older with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, or associated rheumatological conditions (based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition, diagnostic codes). A propensity score was calculated for each patient, and each patientwho was receiving hydroxychloroquine was matched to two patients who were not receiving hydroxychloroquine (controls). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection among those receiving chronic hydroxychloroquine versus the propensity-matched patients not receiving chronic hydroxychloroquine in 2021. Result(s): 322 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine and 645 patients not receiving hydroxychloroquine were included in the primary analysis. The incidence of active SARS-CoV-2 infections during the study period did not differ between patients receiving hydroxychloroquine and patients not receiving hydroxychloroquine ( [0 3%] vs 78 [0 4%] of 21406;odds ratio 0 79, 95% CI 0 52-1 20, p = 0 27). There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes between the two groups of patients who developed active SARS-CoV-2 infection. For all patients in the study, overall mortality was lower in the hydroxychloroquine group than in the group of patients who did not receive hydroxychloroquine (odds ratio hydroxychloroquine was not associated with the development of active SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio 0 79, 95% CI 0 51-1 42) Conclusion(s): Hydroxychloroquine was not associated with a protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large group of patients with rheumatological conditions.

Effect of Aboand Rh Blood Type on Sars-Cov-2 Infection Severity in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Data from the National Sar-Covid Registry

Objectives: To evaluate the association between the ABO and Rh antigens and the clinical characteristics and evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases. Method(s): SAR-COVID is a national, longitudinal, and observational registry. Patients >=18 years of age with a diagnosis of inflammatory or degenerative rheumatic disease, and confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or serology) were included. Data were collected from August 2020 to June 2022. Sociodemographic, clinical data, comorbidities, underlying rheumatic disease, disease activity, and its treatment at the time of infection were recorded, aswell as symptoms, complications and treatments received for COVID-19. The WHO ordinal scale (WHO-OS) was used, and severe COVID-19was defined as WHO-OS>=5. Patients were categorized as follows: blood group A or non-A, and Rh factor positive or negative. Result(s): A total of 1356 patients were included, 547 (40,3%) had blood group A and 809 non-A (59,7%). Regarding the Rh factor, 1230 (90,7%)were positive and 126 (9,3%) negative. Age, sex, ethnicity and comorbidities were comparable between both groups. In both cases, the most frequent rheumatic diseases were rheumatoid arthritis (38,9%;p = 0,052), systemic lupus erythematosus (17,4%;p = 0,530) and osteoarthritis (10,1%;p = 0,888). Patients with non-A blood type presented a higher frequency of psoriatic arthritis (group A 5,1% vs non-A 8,7%;p = 0,015). During SARS-CoV-2 infection, more than 90% of patients in both groups were symptomatic (group A 96.0% vs non-A 94,8%;p = 0,384). Non-A blood group patients had a significantly higher frequency of arthralgia and dysgeusia. In A blood group 18.5% of the patients required hospitalization, 41,0% of them were admitted in the intensive care unit and 5.9% presented complications, while in the non-A blood group, were 16,7%, 31,1% and 5,5%, respectively (p > 0,05 in all the cases). The most frequent complications in both groups were respiratory distress syndrome and sepsis (p > 0,05). The outcome of the COVID-19 infection is detailed in Figure 1. In the multivariate analysis, adjusted for poor prognostic factors, patients with A blood type and those with negative Rh factor presented more likely severe COVID-19. (OR 1,75, 95%CI 1,20-2,56, p = 0,003 and OR 2,63, 95%CI 1,45-4,55, p = 0,001, respectively). Conclusion(s): Blood type A and negative Rh factor were associated with worse COVID-19 outcomes in this national cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases.

Evaluation of Disease Activity in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Follow-Upata University Hospital in Manaus Aftervaccination against Covid-19

Objectives: Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) are predisposed to serious infections due to immunocompromise, comorbidities, immunomodulatory and/or immunosuppressive therapy, as well as the lack of these medications faced by patients dependent on the Sistema Unico de Saude (SUS) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies revealed a low risk of worsening disease activity after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 and safety in the continuity of immunomodulatory therapy during the vaccination stages. Thus, immunization against COVID-19 is an important pillar in reducingmorbidity and mortality related to infectious conditions and SLE. This study had the objective to understand the disease activity in SLE patients after vaccination against COVID-19. Method(s): This is an observational, longitudinal, ambidirectional study with follow-up of subgroups of patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases immunized with vaccines made available by the Programa Nacional de Imunizacao (Butantan Institute, Pfizer/BioNTech, BioManguinhos/Fiocruz and Janssen). Data from the SLE disease activity index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K) and sociodemographic data were collected and stored via an online platform, with a comparison of the index before and after each dose. This study was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee, and it is associated to the SAFER Project from Brazilian Society of Rheumatology. Result(s): A total of 223 patients were included, of which 83% were female and 39% had SLE, 36.7 +/- 11.76 years old. Regarding the disease activity, at inclusion the mean PGA score(SD) was 2,61 +/- 2,77. After the 1st dose it was 1.38 +/- 2.17, after the 2nd dose it was 2,35 +/- 2,99, after the 3rd dose it was 2,19 +/- 2,58 and after the 4th dose 1.18 +/- 1.88. The mean SLEDAI-2 K score at inclusion was 7,27 +/- 9,70, after the 1st dose it was 2,75 +/- 5,29, after the 2nd dose it was 4,73 +/- 6,40, after the 3rd dose 3,33 +/- 5,51 and after the 4th dose 2.12 +/- 4.27. 6% of the patients referred worsening disease activity after the 1st dose, 14,3%after the 2nd dose, and no patient reportedworsening of disease activity after the 3rd and 4th doses. Conclusion(s): Vaccination did not contribute toworsening disease activity of the SLE patientss studied, according to the indices used to assess disease activity.

Cases of Covid-19 in Patients Withi Mmune-Mediated Rheumatic Diseases after Vaccination against Sars-Cov-2 in Manaus-Amazon

Objectives: Immunization against SARS-CoV-2 is an effective strategy to reduce morbidity and mortality in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. People with Immune-mediated Rheumatic Diseases (IMRD) also benefited from this campaign. However, there is a limited amount of data on the outcome of vaccination in these patients, in terms of those who were infected by the virus. This study had the objective to evaluate the rate of COVID-19 cases in patients with IMRD after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Method(s): Observational, longitudinal and ambidirectional study with follow-up of subgroups of patients with IMRD immunized with vaccines made available by the National Immunization Plan (inactivated adsorbed vaccine registered by the Instituto Butantan (IB), recombinant vaccines registered by Bio Manguinhos/ Fiocruz and by Janssen, and Pfizer/BioNTech). Sociodemographic data and questionnaires on flu syndrome, laboratory confirmation of infection and need for hospitalization and outcomes were collected and stored via an online platform. This study is associated to the SAFER Project from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and it was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee. Result(s): A total of 223 patients aged over 18 years, mean age 42.79 +/- 15.18 years, were included. All were within the inclusion/exclusion criteria, with 83% being female. The main IMRD included were systemic lupus erythematosus (39%) and rheumatoid arthritis (33.6%). After the 1st dose, 1.45% of patients had COVID-19, 50% sought health services (emergency care), without the need for hospitalization and after the 2nd dose, 1.5% had the disease, of which none sought health services, required hospitalization or had a negative outcome. After the 3rd dose,: 2.9%were infected with SARS-CoV-2 one month later, 15.6% two to three months later and 5.5% four to six months later, all with laboratory confirmation;only 4% presenting any serious complication;there were no deaths. After the 4th dose, 9.1%of patients had COVID-19, of which 40%were hospitalized, without the need for assisted ventilation;half of these patients had a serious complication, but there no deaths. Conclusion(s): In this study, we observed the effectiveness of the vaccine in preventing severe cases of COVID-19 and complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Assessment of Disease Activity in Adolescent Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Diseases after Vaccination against Covid-19ata University Hospital in Manaus

Objectives: Chronic Inflammatory Immune-mediated Diseases (CIMD) can cause pain and severe discomfort to the patient, leading to significant reductions in his/her quality of life. Vaccination against COVID-19 has proven to be an efficient method in preventing cases and serious repercussions. However, there is insufficient evidence on the safety of these vaccines in the CIMD population. Objective(s): To assess disease activity in adolescent patients with CIMD after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Method(s): Observational, longitudinal, ambidirectional study with follow-up of groups of adolescent patients with CIMDwho received the vaccine provided by the National Immunization Program -Pfizer/BioNTech. Sociodemographic and clinical disease activity data were collected before and after each vaccine dose. Data were stored through an online platform (REDCap). This study is associated to the SAFER Project from the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee. Result(s): Nineteen adolescents aged between 12 and 17 years were included, all of whom met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Of the total, 31.6% have Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA)-14.33 +/- 2.25 years of age, whose subtypes included persistent oligoarticular JIA (16.7%), Polyarticular Rheumatoid Factor (RF) negative (33.3%), Polyarticular RF positive (16.7%) and Systemic (33.3%);68.4% have Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) -14.77 +/- 1.96 years of age. Regarding JIA patients, at inclusion, the mean disease activity assessed by the physician was 3 +/- 3.83 and 3.25 +/- 3.77 as assessed by the patient. After the 1st dose, the mean activity assessed by the physician was 2.8 +/- 3.9 and after the 2nd dose it was 3 +/- 4.24. Themean activity after the first dose as assessed by the patient was 3.2 +/- 3.96, and after the 2nd dose it was 2.8 +/- 3.11. In the SLE patients, at inclusion, the mean degree of disease activity was 1.92 +/- 1.83 and of the SLEDAI-2 K was 4.67 +/- 5.14. After the 1st dose, the mean disease activity was 1.11 +/- 1.96, and after the 2nd dose, it was 2.25 +/- 2.76. After the 1st dose, the SLEDAI-2 K was 1.11 +/- 1.76, and after the 2nd dose it was 4.25 +/- 5.28. No reports of worsening of disease activity after the vaccine were found. Conclusion(s): The vaccination proved not to contribute to worsening of clinical activity of rheumatic diseases in adolescents, without significant changes in SLE assessment indices and in the personal and medical assessment of JIA patients.

Covid 19 in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases

Objectives: BIOBADAGUAY is the Paraguayan/Uruguayan registry of adverse events in patients with inflammatory rheumatic conditions under biologic therapy (BT). Three years have elapsed from the first case of coronavirus and data about South American patients with COVID are still scarce. In this study we analyzed the frequency and clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in a cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases from Paraguay. Method(s): A cross sectional study of Paraguayan patients with rheumatic diseases from BIOBADAGUAY and controls without BT. Clinical, epidemiological, and COVID-19 data were analyzed. Only cases confirmed by SARSCoV-2 positive PCR test were included. Descriptive analysis were performed for this study. Result(s): 832 patients were included (696 under BT and 136 controls). 116 (13.9%) had COVID-19. 22 had a second infection and 9 a third reinfection. Table 1 shows characteristic of COVID-19 patients. The most frequent diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 93, 80.2%) followed by ankylosing spondylitis (n = 6, 5.2%), undifferentiated spondylarthritis (n = 5, 4.3%), psoriatic arthritis (n = 4, 3.4%), juvenile onset arthritis (n = 2, 1.7%), vasculitis (n = 2, 1.7%). Only 1 case (0.8%) were registered for Still's disease, enteropathic spondylarthritis, systemic sclerosis and seronegative polyarthritis, respectively. When comorbidities were analyzed, 46 (39.6%) patients had at least one (Table 1). Of the total treatments received: 65 (56.0%) had methotrexate, 53 (45.7%) leflunomide, 3 (2.5%) sulfasalazine, 15 (12.9%) hydroxychloroquine, 25 (21.5%) glucocorticoid, 52 (44.8%) anti-TNF and 20 (17.2%) non-anti-TNF. COVID-19 severity outcomes were: 101(87%) non severe, 31 (26.7%) severe and 1 fatal(0.8%). 189 (90.9%) patients received vaccination and the mean number of doses were 2.5 doses. 55 (26.4%) had COVID prior to vaccination Conclusion(s): In this study we examined the frequency of COVID-19 in Paraguayan patients with rheumatic diseases. In this cohort of rheumatologic patients, COVID 19 severity was similar to the one in the general population.

Safety and Immunogenicity of Coronavac and Chadox1 Vaccines against Sars-Cov-2 in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Brazilian Multicentric Study

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Method(s): These data are from the 'SAFER (Safety and Efficacy on COVID-19 Vaccine in Rheumatic Diseases)' study, a Brazilian multicentric longitudinal phase IV study to evaluate COVID-19 vaccine in immunomediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs). Adverse events (AEs) in patients with RA were assessed after two doses of ChAdOx1 or CoronaVac. Stratification of postvaccination AEs was performed using a diary, filled out daily. The titers of neutralizing antibodies against the receptor-biding domain of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-RBD) were measured by chemilumine scence test after each dose of immunizers. Proportions between groups were compared using the Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) before and after vaccination was assessed using the McNemar test. Result(s): A total of 188 patients with RA were included in the study, most of them were female. CoronaVac was used in 109 patients and ChAdOx1 in 79. Only mild AEs were observed. The more common AEs after the first dose were pain at injection site (46,7%), headache (39,4%), arthralgia (39,4%) and myalgia (30,5%), and ChAdOx1 had a higher frequency of pain at the injection site (66% vs 32 %, p alpha 0.001) arthralgia (62% vs 22%, p alpha 0.001) and myalgia (45% vs 20%, p alpha 0.001) compared to CoronaVac. The more common AEs after the second dose were pain at the injection site (37%), arthralgia (31%), myalgia (23%) and headache (21%). Arthralgia (41,42 % vs 25 %, p = 0.02) and pain at injection site (51,43% vs 27%, p = 0.001) were more common with ChAdOx1. No patients had a flare after vaccination. The titers of anti-RBDafter two doses of ChAdOx1 were higher compared to two doses of CoronaVac (6,03 BAU/mL vs 4,67 BAU/mL, p alpha 0,001). Conclusion(s): The frequency of local adverse effects, particularly pain at injection site, was high. AEs were more frequent with ChAdOx1, especially after the first dose. The use of the immunizers dis not change the degree of inflammatory activity of the disease. In patients with RA, ChAdOx1 was more immunogenic than CoronaVac. .